Choosing the Right TNF Inhibitor Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Share this content:
TNFis are now the most frequently used biologic for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
TNFis are now the most frequently used biologic for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Biologics, approved nearly 20 years ago for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), transformed treatment, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) are now usually the first and most frequently used biologics.1

Although all TNFis block TNFα and are broadly similar in efficacy and toxicity, resulting in little preference of one over another, there are important differences in TNFis for specific clinical conditions that recent research has made more apparent.2

Most of the important differences among TNFis have been attributed to their structure.3 The 5 TNFis approved for use in RA include 3 full monoclonal antibodies: infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab; 1 fusion protein, etanercept; and a PEGylated Fab fragment, certolizumab. The structural dissimilarities may explain the variance in their in vitro and in vivo actions, which are associated with differences in providing an adaptive immune response (antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity) or innate immune response (complement-dependent cytotoxicity), their capacity to generate apoptosis, and their capacity to neutralize TNFα.3

Choice of TNFi and Infection Risk

Those with RA who have higher disease activity4; who are older; have diabetes, chronic pulmonary disease, or renal failure; or who are taking glucocorticoids are at increased risk for infection.5,6 Because TNFα is involved in the regulation of immunity, blockade may increase the risk for infection, particularly in the first 6 months of therapy, as risk decreases over time.7-9

Rheumatology Advisor spoke with Fabiola Atzeni, MD, PhD, a rheumatologist and associate professor at the University of Messina in Messina, Italy, about her recent paper on similarities and differences of TNFis in RA treatment.3 “There is an increased risk of infection in both standard and high-dose anti-TNF drugs, which was confirmed in a recent meta-analysis,” she said.

The meta-analysis, which was the largest evaluation of randomized controlled trials to date (n=42,330) on the risk for serious infection in patients with RA receiving TNFis compared with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), found a dose-response relationship.8 Compared with DMARDs, standard-dose TNFis (odds ratio [OR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09-1.58) and high-dose TNFis (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.50-2.39) were associated with an increased risk for infection. However, low-dose TNFis (OR, 0.93, 0.65-1.33) were not.

Although individual TNFis are thought to have similar rates of infection,2 results from the Rheumatoid Arthritis-Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT) prospective cohort study of 1529 patients with RA suggest that etanercept may be associated with lower rates of serious bacterial infection.10

Mycobacterial infection risk, in particular, is lower with etanercept than [with] the monoclonal antibodies.2 “All TNFis increase the risk for tuberculosis; however, etanercept has been associated with less of a risk than adalimumab, infliximab, and golimumab,” Dr Atzeni commented. A recent meta-analysis of 100 randomized clinical trials and 63 long-term extension studies showed an incidence rate of tuberculosis in those receiving TNFi monoclonal antibodies of 307.71 (95% CI, 184.79-454.93) compared with 67.58 (95% CI, 12.1-163.94) for etanercept.11

Fungal infections, coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, and listeriosis have also been associated with infliximab more than with etanercept.12,13

Choice of TNFi and Immunogenicity

The development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) is associated with infusion reactions and a loss of efficacy resulting from lowered drug levels, ultimately leading to drug discontinuation.2

In a meta-analysis of 14,651 people with autoimmune disease (RA, spondyloarthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease), the cumulative incidence of ADAs for infliximab (25.3%; 95% CI, 19.5-32.3), adalimumab (14.1%; 95% CI, 8.6-22.3), certolizumab (6.9%; 95% CI, 3.4-13.5), and golimumab (3.8%; 95% CI, 2.1-6.6), were higher than for etanercept (1.2%; 95% CI, 0.4-3.8).14 Additionally, the authors found that overall, ADAs lowered the odds of clinical response by 67%, and concomitant use of immunosuppressives reduced the odds of ADA formation by 74%.

Choice of TNFi in Inflammatory Eye Disease

For inflammatory eye disease, however, etanercept may be inferior to infliximab and adalimumab, at least in juvenile inflammatory arthritis, from which much of the data is extrapolated for RA.2 “In general, uveitis in adults with RA is best treated with monoclonal antibodies. Etanercept has been associated with an increase in uveitis, particularly in juvenile inflammatory arthritis,” Dr Atzeni explained.

Both infliximab and adalimumab allow a reduction in the corticosteroid dose in immune-mediated uveitis.15-17 There are not sufficient data on golimumab and certolizumab to determine effectiveness, but case series have shown positive results.2

Choice of TNFi in Pregnancy

The mother's immunoglobulin G level is the primary means of fetal immunity, with concentrations increasing in the second and third trimesters.2 Whereas infliximab and adalimumab are complete immunoglobulin G antibodies and are actively transported across the placenta, certolizumab is not.2

In a recent prospective observational cohort of 495 women who were pregnant and 1532 controls, TNFis, including adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, certolizumab, and golimumab, were associated with an increased risk for major birth defects (adjusted OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.0-4.8), preterm births (adjusted OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5), but not spontaneous abortion. Birth weights were also lower after TNFi exposure (P =.02).18

Safety data on certolizumab, taken from Union Chimique Belge, a Belgium pharmaceutical company, were published recently.19 Of 339 maternal exposures to certolizumab, there were 254 live births, 52 miscarriages, 32 elective terminations, and 1 stillbirth, which is comparable to outcomes reported in the general United States population.2 Nearly all women had certolizumab exposure during the first trimester, and approximately 33% continued to take certolizumab into the second and third trimesters.

TNFi exposure periconceptually is thought to result in a low risk for adverse outcomes. However, because less certolizumab passes into the fetal circulation, it may have a safety advantage over other TNFis.2

Conclusion

TNFis that may be advantageous in specific clinical situations including the following2:

  • Etanercept over infliximab, adalimumab, or golimumab in people with tuberculosis, histoplasmosis, and coccidioidomycosis infections
  • Etanercept over infliximab and adalimumab when ADAs are a concern; particularly in patients not taking methotrexate or azathioprine
  • Infliximab or adalimumab over etanercept in RA inflammatory eye disease
  • Certolizumab may have advantages over other TNFis in pregnancy, although evidence is limited in choosing one TNFi over another

References

  1. Chaabo K, Kirkham B. Rheumatoid arthritis - anti-TNF. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015;27(2):180-184.
  2. Vashisht P, O'dell J. Not all TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis are created equal: important clinical differences. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2017;17(8):989-999.
  3. Rubbert-Roth A, Atzeni F, Masala IF, Caporali R, Montecucco C, Sarzi-Puttini P. TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis: Are they the same? [published online November 3, 2017] Autoimmun Rev. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.11.005
  4. Au K, Reed G, Curtis JR, et al. High disease activity is associated with an increased risk of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(5):785-791.
  5. Busquets N, Tomero E, Descalzo MÁ, et al. Age at treatment predicts reason for discontinuation of TNF antagonists: data from the BIOBADASER 2.0 registry. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(11):1999-2004.
  6. Curtis JR, Yang S, Patkar NM, et al. Risk of hospitalized bacterial infections associated with biologic treatment among US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66(7):990-997.
  7. Askling J, Fored CM, Brandt L, et al. Time-dependent increase in risk of hospitalisation with infection among Swedish RA patients treated with TNF antagonists. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(10):1339-1344. 
  8. Singh JA, Cameron C, Noorbaloochi S, et al. Risk of serious infection in biological treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2015;386(9990):258-265.
  9. Cobo-Ibáñez T, Descalzo MÁ, Loza-Santamaría E, Carmona L, Muñoz-Fernández S. Serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other immune-mediated connective tissue diseases exposed to anti-TNF or rituximab: data from the Spanish registry BIOBADASER 2.0. Rheumatol Int. 2014;34(7):953-961.
  10. Listing J, Strangfeld A, Kary S, et al. Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologic agents. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(11):3403-3412.
  11. Souto A, Maneiro JR, Salgado E, Carmona L, Gomez-Reino JJ. Risk of tuberculosis in patients with chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated with biologics and tofacitinib: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and long-term extension studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(10):1872-1885.
  12. Wallis RS, Broder MS, Wong JY, Hanson ME, Beenhouwer DO. Granulomatous infectious diseases associated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(9):1261-1265.
  13. Tsiodras S, Samonis G, Boumpas DT, Kontoyiannis DP. Fungal infections complicating tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade therapy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83(2):181-194.
  14. Thomas SS, Borazan N, Barroso N, et al. Comparative immunogenicity of TNF inhibitors: impact on clinical efficacy and tolerability in the management of autoimmune diseases. A systematic review and meta-analysis. BioDrugs. 2015;29(4):241-258.
  15. Foeldvari I, Nielsen S, Kümmerle-Deschner J, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocker in treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis refractory to second-line agents: results of a multinational survey. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(5):1146-1150.
  16. Jaffe GJ, Dick AD, Brézin AP, et al. Adalimumab in patients with active noninfectious uveitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(10):932-943.
  17. Kahn P, Weiss M, Imundo LF, Levy DM. Favorable response to high-dose infliximab for refractory childhood uveitis. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(5):860-864.e2.
  18. Weber-Schoendorfer C, Oppermann M, Wacker E, et al. Pregnancy outcome after TNF-α inhibitor therapy during the first trimester: a prospective multicentre cohort study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80(4):727-739. 
  19. Clowse ME, Wolf DC, Förger F, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in subjects exposed to certolizumab pegol. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(12):2270-2278. 
You must be a registered member of Rheumatology Advisor to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters