|First Report from Clinical Osteoporosis 2017:
A Joint Conference of the NOF & ISCD
Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for bone age assessment shows similar results when tested against traditional radiology, according to a study presented at Clinical Osteoporosis 2017: A Joint ISCD/NOF Symposium from April 20 to 22 in Orlando, Florida.
The investigators analyzed radiographic assessments with Norland bone age assessment to compare studies and sensitivities to change in children.
In 1 study, 18 men (aged 12-19 years) and 20 women (aged 12-16 years) underwent radiographic bone age assessment with the GE Discovery XR656 Digital Radiography System and DXA with the Norland XR-800. Regression analysis was used to determine results in the bone age assessment study.
In the sensitivity-to-change study based on the DXA assessment, 34 men aged 6 to 19 years and 37 women aged 6 to 16 years underwent 2 DXA bone assessments with 3 months between studies to account for a possible increase in bone mineral. Participant follow-up results were used to show an increase greater than the least significant change limit: 4.2% for studies with 1.2% precision.
The results showed that the 2 studies had a similar gross response to bone age. The X-ray and DXA assessed bone ages were found to be highly correlated in men (14.5777+0.9287x; r=0.9897; P <.001) and in women (41.2652+0.7619x; r=0.9250; P <.001).
Overall, 17 of the 34 men showed increases >4.2%, and 17 women showed differences <4.2% in the 2 studies. For the 34 women, 15 participants had increases >4.2% and 19 participants showed differences <4.2% in the 2 studies.
“We conclude that Bone Age Assessment Software can be a useful for bone age assessment and can complement traditional radiographic studies when assessment of short-term change in bone age is desired,” the researchers wrote.
Sun Y, Wang J, Sanchez T. Bone age assessment by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Presented at: Clinical Osteoporosis 2017: A Joint ISCD/NOF Symposium. April 20-22, 2017; Orlando, FL.
This article originally appeared on Endocrinology Advisor