Sex remains underreported in biomedical research, contributing to a dearth of medical research on women’s health, per study data published in the Lancet.

Investigators conducted a bibliometric analysis of more than 11.5 million papers indexed in Web of Science and PubMed between 1980 and 2016. Sex-based reporting was identified per the Medical Subject Headings of each study. In addition, for papers published between 2008 and 2016, the investigators assessed the sex distribution of authors, using a sex assignment algorithm. The algorithm determined the perceived sex of first and last authors by name. Papers were subsequently grouped into 3 disciplinary categories: biomedical research, clinician medicine, and public health. Regression analyses were performed to study the association between the sex of authors and frequency of sex-related reporting. Analyses were adjusted for number of authors, representation of women in specific diseases, geographic location, year, and research specialty.

Related Articles

Between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2016, sex-related reporting increased from 59% to 67% in clinical medicine, and from 36% to 69% in public health research. Sex-based reporting increased more quickly in public health research than in clinical medicine: In 2016, 50% of public health papers indicated sex-related reporting compared with 43% of clinical medicine papers. For biomedical research, however, sex remained underreported: just 31% of biomedical papers in 2016 reported the sex of study samples.

When both first and last authors were women, papers had a significantly increased probability for sex-related reporting (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.27). Compared with North America, papers from other regions, particularly Africa, were more likely to report sex. Sex-related reporting was not as common in high-impact journals as in low-impact journals. In fact, for publications in 2016, sex-related reporting of both men and women was associated with a reduction of −0.51 (95% confidence interval, −0.54 to −0.47) in journal impact factor.

This large-scale bibliometric analysis underscores a lack of sex-related reporting in biomedical research, despite efforts to include more women in health-based studies. Sex-related reporting is important to developing appropriate therapies and interventions for women’s health issues; further research is needed to explore the means to improve sex inclusivity in biomedical research.

Reference

Sugimoto CR, Ahn Y-Y, Smith E, Macaluso B, Laviere V. Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis. Lancet. 2019;393:550-559.

This article originally appeared on Medical Bag